Yeah, sure, whatever! As long as you think of everyone else who rejects your dogmas as inferior to you, you will be treated with the same contempt in return. My position is not weak and hardly needs masking, but thank you for the denialist rhetoric once again.

“Here’s my challenge: Read Origins again and how me how Darwin’s theory could be falsified. Read his own quid pro quos and tell me he didn’t make sure it could never happen. If you cannot show me how this could happen, his theory fails to meet the qualifications of a theory, since it cannot be falsified.”

If YOU have read Darwin’s classic book, prove it by quoting from the specific passages in it where Darwin DID state how his theory could be discredited. You should know them, since Creationists often refer to them in their propaganda. So put up or shut up!

Interesting how each of you simply continue to prove my points. You offer no reason why you should argue at all.

AKA “You’re wrong and you prove me right (even though I don’t have to actually put up an argument or evidence)”.

You’ve not bothered to answer any of my points, though you’ve insults to spare.

Also known as “I didn’t listen to a single criticism of my Creationism”.

Ah, blind faith. As for your points, Mr. Oops! I suppose now you were expecting me to take you seriously? I wonder if you would ever do ME the same courtesy? No?

AKA “You’re persecuting me, you wicked Atheist!”

BTW, Darwin didn’t prove the evolution of the eye. read Origins again. He postulated how it might have come about and stated that we could not, in our ignorance, state that it could not have been possible. That’s not proof; that’s carefully making one’s position, by sheer rhetoric, unfalsifiable.

AKA Pseudo-Scientific Posturing. A close relative of Pseudo-Philosophical Posturing.

Hear Darwin’s rhetoric or mine. Truth often sounds arrogant to those convinced of their ignorances and errors. And I am right.

AKA the unintentional funny, as well as “I’m right because I am, I am, I am!”

Here’s a proposition, at the risk of continuing to cast pearls before boorish swine:

Also known as the Pretend Compromise Made In Order To Make Oneself Look Reasonable.

Instead of giving me a table of factoids and a few editorial comments, let’s actually give an argument worth hearing. You do know how to write a bleeding essay, I hope?

The Condescension Gambit.

I could address each item in your little stacked decks, but that would be nitpickery. I’ve a reason to be on this Earth and I shan’t waste my time with nits. Dragons are more fun to slay.

Otherwise called You’re Not Worth My Time. Usually done after a lengthy response.

Here’s my challenge: Read Origins again and how me how Darwin’s theory could be falsified. Read his own quid pro quos and tell me he didn’t make sure it could never happen. If you cannot show me how this could happen, his theory fails to meet the qualifications of a theory, since it cannot be falsified.

The Strawman.

Bingo!

BTW, Darwin didn’t prove the evolution of the eye. read Origins again. He postulated how it might have come about and stated that we could not, in our ignorance, state that it could not have been possible. That’s not proof; that’s carefully making one’s position, by sheer rhetoric, unfalsifiable.

Hear Darwin’s rhetoric or mine. Truth often sounds arrogant to those convinced of their ignorances and errors. And I am right.

Here’s a proposition, at the risk of continuing to cast pearls before boorish swine: Instead of giving me a table of factoids and a few editorial comments, let’s actually give an argument worth hearing. You do know how to write a bleeding essay, I hope? I could address each item in your little stacked decks, but that would be nitpickery. I’ve a reason to be on this Earth and I shan’t waste my time with nits. Dragons are more fun to slay.

Here’s my challenge: Read Origins again and how me how Darwin’s theory could be falsified. Read his own quid pro quos and tell me he didn’t make sure it could never happen. If you cannot show me how this could happen, his theory fails to meet the qualifications of a theory, since it cannot be falsified.

Game?

[DH, you can join the fun too, if you can keep from simply comparing me to cult leaders to mask the weakness of your position. I might even play nice.]

– Sirius Knott

Or you may prefer to read them here:
http://circleh.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/a-useless-debate/