Anyone wishing to join, please let us know.
Posts Tagged ‘books’
The new Idiosyncratica post is up…
Posted by That Other Mike on 15/07/2008
Posted in books, Idiosyncratica | Tagged: blogging, books, new post | Leave a Comment »
Just a quick one right now…
Posted by That Other Mike on 26/01/2008
… because I have to do the vacuuming and put stuff in to wash and work out and make some dinner. *takes breath*
On the reading list this week:
When True Night Falls, by Celia Friedman. Part 2 of the Coldfire Trilogy, which I am enjoying a great deal. I highly recommend it; it’s a blend of scifi and fantasy.
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, by bell hooks.
Coming later today – nuclear power iz teh suck.
Posted in books | Tagged: books, today | 2 Comments »
Recent, current and near future reading
Posted by That Other Mike on 10/01/2008
AKA, Watch Me Being Literary. With linkage for full benefit. A lot of scifi and fantasy lately, for some reason. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in books | Tagged: books, watch me being all literary, what I'm reading | 13 Comments »
Scifi Stuff
Posted by That Other Mike on 08/01/2008
OK, before I go into my favourite scifi of all time (naturally in my opinion only, list subject to change), I’d like to be a bit geeky about it and post a few thoughts, not necessarily right order in the. Bear with me.
A lot of people get a bit confused about science fiction: they include stuff like the inestimable The Handmaid’s Tale or Aliens, both narratives which seem on the face of it to be prime candidates. A lot of stuff that gets lumped into scifi is really speculative fiction where the science is just handy background or a useful deus ex machine – like Star Trek.
I would argue that the real meaning of science fiction is stories where science drives the story, where it acts as an extra character – it not only enables the story, it is the story.
In light of that, stuff like I Am Legend is science fiction; Star Trek is not.
A little more of Star Trek: it’s utopian or adventure fiction by turns, with the occasional scifi element thrown in for funsies. Gene Roddenbury originally pitched it as “Wagon Train to the stars”, and he was right; nobody ever calls Wagon Train horse fiction.
Ok, I’m done with the geekery. On with the show.
My top five in books:
- I Am Legend, by Richard Matheson – original novel.
- Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood, notwithstanding that she doesn’t like to call it scifi. Everyone has a few novelists whom they don’t simply like but adore; Atwood is one of mine. I can even forgive her becoming a little plot-samey in the past few years.
- Ringworld, by Larry Niven. Thin characters, not much plot… But a ringworld!
- Lord of Light, by Roger Zelazny.
- The Gods Themselves, by Isaac Asimov
Posted in Odds and Sods, science | Tagged: asimov, books, I am legend, margaret atwood, richard matheson, ringworld, science fiction, Scifi, zelazny | 1 Comment »
The God Delusion
Posted by That Other Mike on 19/12/2007
I actually finished The God Delusion a few days ago; I just hadn’t gotten around to writing about it yet.
Stylistically, TGD is classic Dawkins: he is clear and concise with what he has to say, and manages the impressive trick of being highbrow without being condescending. It also exhibits a clarity of purpose, in that every section links in some way to every other, sections follow clearly on from one another, and the reasoning in what he’s saying is clear and acute, even if you happened not to agree. In short, RD performs the kind of scientific and philosophical popularisation for which he is justly famous. No complaints there; the book is easily accessible to just about anyone – which is rather the point.
In terms of content, TGD is something of a disappointment to me, I must admit. As a long term fan of RD, I’ve devoured as much of his work as I could lay my hands on. The bulk of this book is retreading previous ground, although there is possible reason for that – TGD is aimed at being a clarification and amalagamation rather than a groundbreaker, and is probably written more for the person who has heard of Dawkins and his famously-controversial stance but not yet read anything by him. In short, I believe it to be intended as a primer for possible Atheists.
That being said, it does the job very well. Established Dawkins fans may be disappointed by the overall lack of new content, but, then again, this book isn’t for us.
Basically, if you know Dawkins’s work already, you won’t find anything much new here; if you don’t, then this book neatly collects and encapsulates the interesting stuff he’d had to say about gods and religion over the years.
Posted in Atheism | Tagged: Atheism, atheist, books, dawkins, philosophy, review, science, the god delusion | 3 Comments »